No Ki-jun, an employee at an insurance company, decides to develop a divorce insurance policy after personally experiencing three divorces that impacted his life and finances. Despite potential biases, he believes divorce is an unforeseen disaster and establishes a team for divorce insurance.
What’s hotView All






08162858505
08162958505
asif khan
good film
good
good
good
😂
nice
2c20m4
My family every time say that I am killing my time here at net,
but I know I am getting experience all the time by reading such good articles or reviews.
up8d43
th4ru2
om9gqa
difficult to load
nice
rj4mcy
No Ki-jun’s idea of divorce insurance is both innovative and controversial. It’s interesting how his personal experiences shaped such a unique business concept. However, one might question whether this insurance could trivialize the emotional aspects of divorce. How does the policy address the psychological impact on individuals? It’s impressive that he turned his struggles into a potential solution for others, but could this lead to people rushing into marriages knowing they’re “insured”? What are the long-term societal implications of such a policy? Would love to hear more about how the team plans to balance financial protection with emotional sensitivity.
kdotpa
No Ki-jun’s divorce insurance idea is undeniably bold, but it feels like it’s missing something crucial. Sure, financial protection is important, but doesn’t this risk making marriage seem like just another contract? How does this policy account for the emotional trauma divorce brings? It’s impressive he’s turning personal pain into a business, but could this create a mindset where people care less about staying committed because they’re insured? What about the societal message this sends—does it encourage carelessness in relationships? I’d love to hear more about how they plan to address these deeper issues, not just the financial ones. Do you think this kind of insurance could do more harm than good in the long run?
download
4dnvc7
difficult to download
interesting